In-store vs. online A/B testing: Why both matter

Featured image

While the specific methodologies and tools may differ between in-store and online A/B testing, the core principles of experimentation, data-driven decision-making, and a focus on improving the customer experience unite them. Retailers use both types of testing to refine their strategies and deliver better results, whether in the digital or physical realm of retail.

How in-store and online A/B testing improve retail outcomes

Both in-store and online A/B testing are valuable for retailers because they serve different but complementary purposes in optimizing the customer experience, increasing sales, and achieving business objectives. Here’s why both types of A/B testing matter:

  1. Holistic Customer Experience
    Retailers often have a presence both online and in physical stores. A/B testing in both environments allows them to create a cohesive, seamless, and positive customer experience across all touchpoints. This consistency is crucial for building customer trust and loyalty.
  2. Different Customer Bases
    Online and in-store customers may have different preferences and behaviors. A/B testing in both domains helps retailers understand and cater to the unique needs of these distinct customer segments, ensuring they don’t miss opportunities in either space.
  3. Multichannel Retailing
    Many retailers operate in a multichannel environment, with both online and physical store sales. A/B testing helps them optimize each channel while considering the impact on the other. For example, an online promotion might drive foot traffic to physical stores, and vice versa.
  4. Diverse Product Offerings
    Some products or services may be exclusive to either the online or in-store environment. A/B testing ensures that each channel’s offerings are optimized to maximize sales and customer satisfaction.
  5. Adaptation to Changing Consumer Behaviors
    Consumer behaviors are constantly evolving, and the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the shift to online shopping. Retailers must adapt to these changes. A/B testing helps them fine-tune their strategies in both the digital and physical realms to meet changing customer expectations.
  6. Data-Driven Decision-Making
    Both online and in-store A/B testing provide valuable data and insights into customer behavior, preferences, and the impact of changes. This data informs data-driven decision-making for the entire retail operation, leading to more effective strategies and resource allocation.
  7. Competitive Edge
    Retail is highly competitive, and successful businesses need every advantage they can get. A/B testing, whether online or in-store, allows retailers to gain a competitive edge by continuously optimizing their strategies and staying ahead of the competition.
  8. Optimizing Resources
    A/B testing helps retailers allocate resources more efficiently. By understanding what changes have the most significant impact on sales and customer satisfaction, they can invest resources where they matter most.
  9. Enhancing Customer Engagement
    Both online and in-store A/B testing can lead to improvements in customer engagement. A better shopping experience, whether online or in-store, can lead to increased customer loyalty and positive word-of-mouth recommendations.
  10. Risk Mitigation
    By testing changes before fully implementing them, retailers can mitigate the risk of making costly mistakes. A/B testing helps them make informed decisions and avoid unnecessary expenses.

Similarities between online and offline testing

Online A/B testing and in-store A/B testing, despite their differences in execution due to the digital and physical environments they operate in, share some similarities in terms of their fundamental purpose and principles:

Testing Hypotheses: Both online and in-store A/B testing involve testing specific hypotheses or ideas. Retailers formulate hypotheses about changes they believe will improve the shopping experience, increase sales, or achieve other business goals.

Randomization: In both cases, randomization is employed to ensure that test groups are as similar as possible, except for the variable being tested. This helps reduce bias and ensures that the results are more likely to be statistically significant and accurate.

Control and Treatment Groups: Both types of testing use control groups and treatment groups. Control groups experience the existing or standard conditions, while treatment groups are exposed to the changes being tested. Comparing the outcomes of these two groups helps assess the impact of the changes.

Data Collection: In both scenarios, data is collected to measure the effects of the changes. This data can include various metrics like conversion rates, sales, customer satisfaction scores, and more, depending on the specific goals of the test.

Statistical Analysis: Both online and in-store A/B testing require statistical analysis to determine whether the observed differences in the outcomes are statistically significant or merely due to chance. Statistical methods are used to draw valid conclusions from the data.

Iterative Process: Both types of testing are part of an iterative process of continuous improvement. The results of A/B tests inform future decisions and strategies, leading to ongoing refinements aimed at enhancing the customer experience and achieving business objectives.

Goal-Oriented: Both approaches are ultimately aimed at achieving specific goals, such as increasing sales, improving customer satisfaction, or optimizing operational efficiency.

Customer-Centric: In both cases, the focus is on improving the customer experience. Whether online or in-store, the goal is to better serve and engage customers to drive positive outcomes.

Feedback and Learning: A/B testing, whether online or in-store, provides valuable feedback and insights into customer behavior and preferences. Retailers can use this feedback to learn about their customers and adapt their strategies accordingly.

Resource Allocation: Both online and in-store A/B testing require the allocation of resources, including time, personnel, and potentially budget, to plan, execute, and analyze the tests.


Online A/B Testing:

  • Digital Environment: Online A/B testing is conducted in the digital realm, typically on e-commerce websites or mobile apps. It involves making changes to web pages, email campaigns, or app features to measure their impact on user behavior.
  • Ease of Implementation: Online A/B testing is relatively easy to set up and execute. Changes can be made quickly, and results can be measured in real-time or over a defined period.
  • Large Data Sets: Online testing often involves large data sets, as it can reach a wide audience. This allows for statistically significant results and insights into user behavior.
  • Personalization: Online A/B testing can be highly personalized, with the ability to target specific user segments based on demographics, behavior, or preferences.
  • Automation: Many online A/B testing tools offer automation features that make it easier to manage multiple tests simultaneously.
  • Tracking Metrics: Common online metrics include click-through rates, conversion rates, bounce rates, session duration, and revenue per visitor.
  • Rapid Iteration: Online retailers can quickly iterate and optimize based on A/B test results, allowing for continuous improvement.

In-Store A/B Testing:

  • Physical Environment: In-store A/B testing takes place in brick-and-mortar retail locations. Changes may involve store layout, signage, product placement, or the shopping experience.

  • Implementation Challenges: In-store testing can be more challenging to execute, as it often requires physical changes to the store layout, displays, or signage.

  • Smaller Data Sets: In-store tests usually involve smaller data sets compared to online testing. This can make it more challenging to achieve statistical significance.

  • Limited Personalization: In-store testing is less personalized than online testing since it’s often difficult to target specific customer segments individually.
  • Manual Processes: Many in-store changes require manual adjustments, such as moving products or rearranging store fixtures. This can be time-consuming.
  • Tracking Metrics: Metrics for in-store testing may include foot traffic, sales conversion rates, average transaction value, and customer feedback.
  • Slower Iteration: Implementing changes in physical stores can be slower and may require more planning, making it harder to iterate rapidly.

Because in-store A/B testing can be operationally more challenging, it’s essential to rely on software such as MarketDial that can standardize the test design and ensure accuracy. While online and in-store A/B testing share the goal of improving the customer experience and driving sales, they operate in different environments and have unique challenges. Online testing offers more automation, personalization, and the ability to work with larger data sets, while in-store testing involves physical changes and may require more time and resources. A comprehensive retail strategy may incorporate elements of both online and in-store A/B testing to create a seamless and optimized shopping experience.

To learn more about how to integrate in-store and online A/B testing, check out these resources:
Quantifying online influence: Measuring the impact of online advertising in physical stores
Solving the omnichannel conundrum
How A/B testing supports in-store retail media networks

Ready to start experimenting?

Put us to the test. Let us answer all your innovative questions.